Our Methodology
From Signal to Thesis: A Three-Phase Process
Pelican is an AI research platform for hedge funds. We turn market signals into defensible, cited investment theses through a three-phase workflow: (1) programmatic idea generation across six analyzers scored on a transparent 10-point scale, (2) a 25-stage, archetype-aware research gauntlet tailored to each company’s business model, and (3) an AI Agent Layer—a mixture-of-experts interface that makes every artifact in our database instantly queryable with citations. Below are the three phases.
Phase 1: High-Conviction Signal Generation
The process begins by filtering the market for actionable signals. We use six independent programmatic modules to scan millions of data points, each designed to capture a different source of potential alpha. Every signal is graded on a transparent, 10-point conviction scale.
Behavioral & Conviction Signals
- Insider Buys: We screen for direct, open-market purchases by corporate insiders (CEOs, CFOs, Directors), viewing these actions as the strongest signal of conviction in a company's value.
- 13F Institutional Analysis: We track the quarterly filings of over 50 of the world's most successful activist and value-oriented funds to detect "smart money" movements. By focusing on a curated list of elite managers—such as Elliott Management, Starboard Value, Pershing Square, and Trian Partners—we can identify high-conviction signals based on convergence (many top funds buying) and concentration (single funds making huge bets).
- Congressional Trades: We monitor stock purchases by members of Congress, with a heavy emphasis on bipartisan cluster buys—where multiple politicians from both parties acquire the same stock.
Fundamental & Market Signals
- Quantitative Screens: We apply rigorous Growth at a Reasonable Price (GARP) and Deep Value screens using TTM fundamental data to find companies that are statistically cheap or exhibit high financial quality.
- Price Target Analysis: We screen for significant upgrades from reputable sell-side analysts where new price targets imply substantial upside from the current price.
- Press Release Catalysts: An AI-powered module filters out routine announcements to score only definitive, positive catalysts (e.g., major contracts, spin-offs) with a 3 to 24-month horizon.
Our Conviction Scoring Frameworks
Transparency is a core principle at Pelican. Below is the exact scoring rubric used by each of our programmatic analyzers to grade signals on our 10-point conviction scale.
1. Quantitative Screener
This analyzer scores companies based on a blend of valuation, quality, and financial health metrics.
Rating Scale (10-Point Score):
- 9.0 - 10.0: Elite Signal
- 8.0 - 8.9: Strong Signal
- 7.0 - 7.9: Noteworthy Signal
- 6.0 - 6.9: Meets Minimum Criteria
Point System by Pillar:
- Valuation (Max: 3.0 points)
- EV/FCF: <10 (+2.0), <15 (+1.5), <25 (+1.0), <40 (+0.5)
- P/B: <1.2 (+1.0), <2.0 (+0.75), <3.5 (+0.25)
- Business Quality (Max: 3.0 points)
- ROIC: >20% (+1.0), >12% (+0.75), >5% (+0.25)
- ROE: >20% (+1.0), >12% (+0.75), >5% (+0.25)
- Gross Margin: >50% (+1.0), >30% (+0.75), >15% (+0.25)
- Financial Health (Max: 2.0 points)
- Net Debt/EBITDA: <2.0x (+1.0), <4.0x (+0.5)
- Interest Coverage: >5.0x (+1.0), >2.5x (+0.5)
- Analyst Consensus (Max: 2.0 points)
- Upside %: >100% (+2.0), >60% (+1.5), >30% (+1.0), >15% (+0.5)
Note on Normalization: If Analyst Consensus data is unavailable, the final score is calculated based on the available pillars (max 8.0 points) and then mathematically scaled to the 10-point system.
2. Insider Analyzer
This analyzer scores signals from open-market purchases by corporate insiders.
Rating Scale (Total Points):
- 10/10: 15+ points
- 9/10: 12-14 points
- 8/10: 9-11 points
- 7/10: 6-8 points
- 6/10: 4-5 points
Point System (Per-Insider Aggregated Action):
- Role: C-Suite (+3), Director/Chair (+2), Other (+1)
- Value: >$1M (+5), >$500k (+4), >$250k (+3), >$100k (+1)
- Stake Increase %: >100% (+5), New Stake (+4), >50% (+3), >25% (+2), >10% (+1)
- Bonus: 3+ Insider Cluster (+4), 2-Insider Cluster (+2), Corroborating Value >$100k (+1/each)
3. Congress Analyzer
This analyzer scores stock purchases disclosed by members of the U.S. Congress.
Rating Scale (Total Points):
- 10/10: 10+ points
- 9/10: 9 points
- 8/10: 8 points
- 7/10: 6-7 points
- 6/10: 4-5 points
Point System:
Score = (Lead Purchase Score) + (Bonuses)
- Lead Purchase Score (Min Value): >$250k (+8), >$100k (+6), >$50k (+5), >$15k (+3), >$1k (+2)
- Bonuses: Cluster Foundation (+1), 2-Member Cluster (+2), 3+ Member Cluster (+4), Bipartisan Cluster (+2)
4. 13F Holdings Analyzer
This analyzer scores stocks based on the quarterly holdings of elite investment funds.
Rating Scale (Total Points):
- 10/10: 28+ points (Highest Conviction Signal)
- 9/10: 22-27 points (Very High Conviction Signal)
- 8/10: 16-21 points (High Conviction Signal)
- 7/10: 11-15 points (Strong Signal)
- 6/10: 7-10 points (Noteworthy Signal)
Point System (Cumulative Across Categories):
- 1. Holding Convergence: Is a Top 5 position in 10+ funds: +10 pts, etc.
- 2. Buying Convergence: NEW position for 5+ funds: +10 pts, etc.
- 3. High-Weighting Conviction: Position is >25% of a fund's portfolio: +8 pts, etc.
- 4. Mismatched Size Bonus: Mega Fund (>$20B AUM) buys Micro Cap (<$500M): +10 pts, etc.
5. Press Release AI Analyst
This analyzer uses a qualitative, event-driven rubric to score the durable materiality of press releases relative to market cap. Biotech events are excluded, and items scoring below 7 are filtered out by design.
Rating Scale & Calibration (3–24 month catalysts):
- 10 — Structural Inflection (Exceptional): Events that redefine the company’s economics or asset base. (e.g., Spin-off ≥100% of mcap)
- 9 — Franchise-Altering (Rare): Fundamental change to financial structure or control. (e.g., Sale of a division for >30% of mcap)
- 8 — Transformational Catalyst (Material): High-confidence, multi-quarter rerating setup. (e.g., Buyback of 10–20% of mcap)
- 7 — Strong, Actionable Catalyst: Clear positive, credible “slow-fuse” setup. (e.g., Multi-year contract worth 10–25% of mcap)
6. Price Target Analyzer
This analyzer scores new price targets from sell-side analysts. We set a high bar for entry, requiring significant analyst conviction (>50% upside) before a signal is even considered. Top-tier ratings are reserved for signals that also demonstrate strong fundamental quality.
Rating Scale (Total Points):
- 10/10: 15+ points
- 9/10: 13 - 14 points
- 8/10: 10 - 12 points
- 7/10: 7 - 9 points
- 6/10: 5 - 6 points
Point System: (Base Score) + (Quantitative Bonuses)
Base Score Components:
- Analyst Conviction: >100% Upside (+7), >75% (+5), >50% (+3)
- Consensus Conviction: >50% Upside (+4), >30% (+2)
- Analyst Quality: From Elite Firm (+2)
- Special Rule: If the new rating is the only one, a flat +1 point is awarded.
Quantitative Bonus Points:
- Quality/Profitability (ROIC): Rewards high-quality, efficient operators.
- ROIC > 20% (Elite): +2 points
- ROIC > 10% (Strong): +1 point
- Asset Valuation (P/TB): Rewards companies trading at a discount to tangible assets.
- P/TB < 1.0 (Deep Value): +2 points
- P/TB < 2.0 (Attractive): +1 point
- Cash Flow Valuation (EV/FCF): Rewards companies cheap relative to cash generation.
- EV/FCF < 10 (Elite): +2 points
- EV/FCF < 15 (Attractive): +1 point
Phase 2: The 360-Degree Research Gauntlet
Every high-conviction signal automatically triggers a comprehensive due diligence report. This is where we apply the archetype-specific lens to analyze the company from every critical angle.
Pillar 1: The Quantitative Foundation
We conduct a forensic audit of the company's financial health to establish an objective baseline.
- Historical Performance & Volatility: We analyze trends and volatility in Revenue, Profit Margins, and Cash Flow, culminating in an Overall Financial Predictability score.
- Liquidity & Solvency Stress-Testing: We perform a full credit risk analysis, including a review of covenants and a calculation of the company's Liquidity Runway under severe stress.
- Asset Quality & Downside Protection: We perform a Net Liquidation Value (NLV) Analysis, applying conservative haircuts to estimate the absolute floor of value.
Pillar 2: Management & Accountability
We assess the competence and credibility of the leadership team, focusing on their alignment with shareholder interests.
- Forensic Capital Allocation: We quantitatively score management’s past capital allocation decisions (M&A, Buybacks, CapEx) against value-accretive criteria, resulting in an Overall Capital Allocation Skill Score.
- Execution Track Record: We systematically track management's historical guidance against actual results to quantify their forecast reliability and execution hit rate.
- Communication Credibility: We quantitatively score earnings call transcripts for Candor, Realism, and Clarity of Strategy to provide an objective benchmark for management's trustworthiness.
Pillar 3: Intrinsic & Relative Valuation
We triangulate valuation using multiple, archetype-appropriate methodologies to determine an intrinsic value range.
- Intrinsic Valuation: We build an archetype-specific Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model to estimate fair value.
- Relative & Historical Valuation: We conduct a Comparable Company Analysis (Comps) and analyze current multiples against the company's own historical ranges.
- Scenario Modeling: The final valuation uses a Probability-Weighted Expected Return (PWER) framework, with Bull, Base, and Bear case probabilities informed by our analysis.
Pillar 4: The Strategic "Outside View"
We pressure-test the internal view against external market reality and strategic forces.
- External Reality Check: We use Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) to uncover unfiled risks, customer "ground truth," and contrarian bull/bear theses.
- Capital Cycle Analysis: We determine the industry's position in its capital cycle (from "Bust" to "Peak") to identify structural tailwinds or headwinds.
- Variant Perception: We systematically challenge consensus to articulate a non-consensus Variant Perception—what we believe the market is missing.
Phase 3: The AI Analyst Team & Conversational Interface
The entire data ecosystem—from the initial signals to the final research outputs—is made fully accessible through our AI Agent Layer. This is not a single chatbot; it is a "mixture of experts" system where a central orchestrator intelligently routes your questions to a team of specialist AI agents, each an expert in a specific domain.
- The Orchestrator: Acts as the central "brain," understanding your intent and directing your query to the specialist best equipped to provide a fast, accurate, and cited answer.
- Document Experts: A team of agents, each a specialist in a specific document type. Whether you're asking about an annual report (10-K), a proxy statement, or an earnings call transcript, your question is handled by an agent with deep expertise in that source.
- Live Data Agent: Connects to real-time APIs to answer questions about current market data, from stock prices and analyst targets to the full text of the latest 8-K filings.
- Idea Generation Agent: Allows you to conversationally explore the entire database of historical signals, filtering by conviction score, source, or theme.
- Synthesis Agent: The capstone agent that has read all of our completed research. It can synthesize findings across multiple reports and answer high-level questions about our final investment theses, catalysts, and risks.
This architecture ensures that every answer is not just a summary, but a piece of evidence, with every key fact cited directly back to its source document.
The Capstone: An Actionable Investment Thesis
The final output of this three-phase process is not just data; it's a decisive, actionable investment plan. It includes a clear Buy/Hold/Sell Recommendation, a probability-weighted price target, a specific position sizing rationale, and a detailed monitoring plan focused on tracking the primary catalyst and mitigating the primary risk ("Thesis Killer").